#Star wars battlefront cockpit view Patch

Larger publishers who are bearish on VR have an entry point without over-investing. We can see this working well with Evolve, but not so much with Dark Souls.Дespite itвЂ™s challenges, asymmetrical game play is an option whose issues can be solved much more easily than trying to fix the installed base. Asymmetrical VR is not for every genre either. Battlefront is currently only on PSVR, but would it require two SKUs? If not, do you allow players to switch between VR and non-VR? Are they offered at different price points.

Do non-VR players get to play AT-ATs? Does the VR headset give VR players an advantage? Obviously, there are incremental costs of developing specific slices of the game for VR. Balancing the game play requires some questions to be answered. Of course, the asymmetrical approach is not without its challenges. Players enjoy the immersion of VR in two of the most formidable and iconic vehicles in the Star Wars universe. Come across enough tokens and he or she hops into the towering AT-AT, fighting alongside Darth Vader and the Snowtroopers on the ground. They see the cockpit from inside the AT-ST, their camera controls and rotational movement locked to the headset. Like their non-VR teammates, VR players enter the game, but strap into an AT-ST. So how might this look from a game play perspective? Taking the Battle on Hoth as an example, a player with a PlayStation VR logs in as a VR player on the Empire side. Absent the multiplayer feature, you end up with a binary decision: built for VR or not built for VR. One game, accessible to multiple players, each of which can experience the game in their own way.

Online Multiplayer: This is what really overcomes the installed base issue.

The AT-AT, AT-ST and turret all fit within the proven comfortable genres for VR: cockpit (see EVE Valkyrie) and tower defense (which removes locomotion from the motion sickness equation). Multiple Classes/Vehicles/Turrets: This means there are distinct slices of the game that can have itвЂ™s camera and controls modified for the VR player.But letвЂ™s take a look at the other ingredients that make asymmetrical VR game play possible for Battlefront: Normally this would be a problem, but thatвЂ™s the beauty of Battlefront and it starts with playable vehicles, namely the AT-AT, AT-ST and turrets. Simply put, asymmetrical VR is VR players and non-VR players in the same game at the same time.Д«ut the experts say all VR must be built from the ground up for VR! How can you mix the two? Instead, designers would beВ focused on creating a built-for-VR component of the game that brings all the added immersion and presence of VR without detracting from the overall experience.

#Star wars battlefront cockpit view Patch

This strategy shouldnвЂ™t be confused with a simple port or compatibility patch that disagrees with the design constraints of virtual reality (see Dying Light). This gives developers and publishers a chance to dabble in VR while avoiding the risk of virtual realityвЂ™s small installed base. Simply put, asymmetrical VR is VR players and non-VR players in the same game at the same time. Battlefront VR seems to be built exclusively for VR, this postВ is a theoryВ on how publishers can benefit from a game that both VR and non-VR players can experience together. While this approach cannot work with all games, Battlefront and games like it could be the best-practice. Asymmetrical game play in virtual reality is an untapped opportunity for larger publishers to play in the VR space while minimizing risks and overcoming the installed base hurdle.